MPS should partner with tech firms to recruit digital specialists into CT policing, says report

The London Assembly Police and Crime Committee says the MPS faces “significant challenges in recruiting and retaining digital specialists into counter-terror policing”.

Its report published on Monday (April 24) also says the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) needs to work with the MPS to conduct a review of the key risk factors for young people becoming radicalised.

The committee warns London’s emergency services are facing capacity pressures that could have “a major impact on their ability to respond to a major terrorist incident”.

A spokesperson said: “The London Assembly Police and Crime Committee recognises that London’s blue light services have further improved how they work together to ensure they are ready to respond to any terror attack.

“However, with both the MPS and London Fire Brigade placed in a form of special measures, and the London Ambulance Service facing capacity pressures, it is crucial that all services continue to prioritise this vital work.”

The committee is urging the Mayor of London too seek assurances from the London Ambulance Service that its contingency plans to treat casualties in the context of a major terrorist attack are “realistic and deliverable”.

The current threat to the UK from terrorism is ‘substantial’, meaning that an attack is likely to happen. Terrorism remains a significant concern for Londoners and is a priority for the mayor.

In 2016, the mayor appointed Lord Harris of Haringey to conduct a “full and independent review to ensure London is as prepared as possible to respond to a major terrorist incident”.

In July 2021, Lord Harris was commissioned to undertake a second review in the context of the changing nature of the threat of terrorism. He made 294 recommendations in several key areas.

One-year on from this second major review into London’s preparedness for a terror attack, the committee’s report says that with extremist ideologies becoming “increasingly diversified and complex”, it was important to better understand which people are most at risk of radicalisation

Staffing pressures faced by prisons and the London Probation Service also risk undermining efforts to manage the risk posed by terrorist offenders to the public, staff and others in contact with the criminal justice system.

In particular, more needs to be done to increase awareness of, and confidence in, Prevent as a key anti-radicalisation programme.

Chair of the London Assembly Police and Crime Committee, Susan Hall AM, said: “London’s blue light services are working hard to ensure they are ready in the awful event that another terror attack occurs in London.

“The failures identified in the emergency services response to the Manchester Arena attack have shown just how important it is to be prepared to respond rapidly and effectively.

“We recognise the significant pressures facing our emergency services and we are concerned that this could hinder an effective response to a major incident.

“Because of this, we want the London Ambulance Service and the London Fire Brigade to update us on the progress they have made in implementing Lord Harris’ recommendations.

“We are also urging the mayor to seek assurances from the London Ambulance Service that its plans in the context of a major terrorist attack are realistic and deliverable, considering the strain it is currently facing.

“Prevent also plays a key role in London’s anti-terrorism strategy. Its resources must be targeted at those at risk of becoming terrorists to stop future attacks.”