Former officer guilty of creating witness account

PC Neal Murray first appeared at Teesside Magistrates’ Court in July 2023, after being charged with misconduct in public office.

The officer created a false witness account and signed an entry under a victim’s name in his electronic pocket notebook on November 21, 2020.

Following a referral from the force in March 2021 the IOPC began an independent investigation into a number of allegations, which concluded in March 2022. A file was submitted to the Crown Prosecution Service which reviewed the evidence and authorised the charge in March 2023.

PC Murray pleaded guilty on Tuesday (August 27) before a trial at Teesside Crown Court was set to start. He is due to be sentenced on Thursday October 17.

Evidence gathered showed that PC Murray attended a domestic incident on October 29 2020 involving a report of criminal damage and undertook initial investigative tasks including meeting the victim at their home and taking an initial statement.

PC Murray said he returned to the address on November 21, 2020, and was advised by the victim that they wanted to retract their original statement which they signed to confirm on his electronic notebook.

This led to PC Murray closing the investigation and he informed his supervisor that the victim did not support a prosecution.

The victim subsequently said that PC Murray had not come to their home on November 21 and nor had they completed any document to say that they wished to retract their complaint.

Data analysed by investigators showed that when the retraction statement was completed, PC Murray was in the immediate vicinity of Hartlepool police station, not the home address where the alleged crime had been committed.

A review of the signature on the retraction statement also showed distinct differences to the original statement which the victim confirmed they signed and the one on PC Murray’s electronic pocket notebook.

IOPC Regional Director Emily Barry said: “Our investigation found that PC Murray falsified a record and did not accurately record what had taken place. This was a deliberate and dishonest act designed to end an investigation into a complaint made by a member of public. He has shown a lack of professionalism, a lack of respect for the rights of members of the public and of the law, and grossly breached his authority.

“As an experienced police officer, he would have known the importance of providing accurate information on a witness statement and the implications of not doing so. His actions had the potential to seriously undermine aspects of legitimacy within the police service.

“His conviction sends a clear message to officers who risk breaching the trust and confidence members of the public have for police, when they do not act with honesty and integrity.”

The IOPC said following its investigation, it found PC Murray also had a case to answer for gross misconduct in relation to his conduct. The officer, however, was dismissed by Cleveland Police in May 2024 in relation to separate allegations.